You're just one STEP away to hire a MentorPro
Technology we work in:
Services we provides:
Here are the top 10 code review tools chosen from a pool of 32 options:
Incorporating automated tools into your code review process can enhance efficiency and ensure comprehensive analysis across multiple languages, contributing to best code review practices.
Utilizing AI-driven code review solutions can revolutionize your development workflow, offering intelligent insights and automation to enhance the efficacy of your code review process, thus embodying the essence of best practices in code review.
When selecting the right code review tool for your needs, it’s important to consider several key factors:
By considering these factors, you can make a more informed decision when choosing a code review software that best meets your requirements and integrates smoothly into your existing processes.
Best for reviewing code in a natural and contextual way
Overview
New Relic is a SaaS product primarily focused on performance monitoring. It offers tools to monitor software performance, detect errors, and understand performance issues deeply. New Relic CodeStream, a part of New Relic, facilitates code review processes seamlessly within the integrated development environment (IDE).
Pricing
New Relic offers a free version and paid plans starting from $49 per user per month.
Why I Picked New Relic
New Relic CodeStream provides a collaborative platform tailored for developers, enabling code discussions and reviews in a natural and contextual manner. It simplifies discussions by integrating seamlessly within the IDE, preserving institutional knowledge often lost in email threads or chat channels. From development sprint inception to code merging through pull requests, CodeStream supports the developer’s workflow. Integration with New Relic enhances its capabilities, providing insights into code performance in real-world production environments.
Standout Features & Integrations
New Relic provides detailed performance insights, allowing developers to analyze database queries, external services, and more. It offers seamless integrations with over 500 apps, including cloud platforms like AWS, Azure, CI/CD tools, communication tools like Slack, and monitoring/analytics tools like Grafana and Datadog. Additionally, it offers an API for building custom integrations.
Pros
Cons
Best code repository tool with code review capabilities
Overview
GitHub is an open-source code repository tool widely used by developers, DevOps engineers, and QA testers. It offers built-in lightweight code review features, making it a popular choice for software development projects.
Pricing
GitHub offers a free plan and paid plans starting from $3.67 per user per month.
Why I Picked GitHub
GitHub stands out as an essential tool for modern software development, especially within continuous integration and continuous deployment (CI/CD) pipelines. Its code review features are centered around pull requests, providing a platform for discussions and reviews before changes are merged into the repository. GitHub not only facilitates code collaboration but also serves as a global platform for discovering and sharing software.
Standout Features & Integrations
Key features include automated workflows, diff views for tracking updates, pull request creation and review, timeline interface, commit history, comments, and permissions management through repository settings. GitHub integrates with various tools including Microsoft Teams, Slack, CircleCI, Jira, Codacy, and others.
Pros
Cons
Best Git-based code tool for teams using Jira
Overview
Bitbucket, developed by Atlassian, is a code hosting and collaboration tool designed to streamline software development processes. It seamlessly integrates with other Atlassian tools like Jira and Trello, making it a preferred choice for DevOps teams.
Pricing
Bitbucket offers a free plan for up to 5 users and paid plans starting from $3 per user per month.
Why I Picked Bitbucket
Bitbucket serves as a comprehensive platform for professionals to work, collaborate, and manage git repositories effectively. Its integration with Atlassian servers eliminates the need for on-premises hosting, enabling teams to instantly develop, test, and deploy projects. With features like APIs for workflow configuration, merge checklists, and build history tracking, Bitbucket offers a flexible and adaptable source code management solution for development teams.
Standout Features & Integrations
Key features include code review, collaboration tools, automated webhook development, pipeline build processes, and repository management. Bitbucket integrates seamlessly with Jira, Atlassian Open DevOps, Jenkins, Bamboo, and other tools.
Pros
Cons
Best for automating code quality
Overview
Codacy is a tool designed to automate code reviews for DevOps teams. It helps organizations establish and execute a streamlined code review process to ensure code quality and consistency across projects.
Pricing
Codacy offers a 14-day free trial and subscription plans starting from $15 per month.
Why I Picked Codacy
Codacy simplifies the code review process and saves time by automating code quality checks. It continuously monitors code quality on each pull request or commit, ensuring that the code produced meets predefined standards across teams and projects.
Standout Features & Integrations
Key features include code quality improvement, code coverage tracking, customizable rulesets, and code standardization. Codacy integrates seamlessly with GitHub, Bitbucket, Slack, Jira, and other tools. It also offers webhook notifications, enabling integration with custom services by sending POST messages after analyzing each commit.
Pros
Cons
Best unified code review tool
Overview
RhodeCode is an enterprise-level code review platform tailored for behind-the-firewall source code management tools such as Git, Mercurial, and Subversion. It offers built-in security features like permission management to ensure secure software development.
Pricing
RhodeCode offers a 30-day free trial and subscription plans starting from $8 per user per month.
Why I Picked RhodeCode
RhodeCode excels in providing centralized control over distributed repositories, offering enhanced user control and a unified security framework. This feature gives Chief Technology Officers (CTOs) peace of mind while facilitating faster code delivery with its collaborative environment that promotes best practices across an organization’s codebase.
Standout Features & Integrations
Key features include unified repository management, team collaboration, robust security measures, and workflow automation. RhodeCode integrates with various tools including TeamCity, Git, Jira, Jenkins, Bamboo, Mercurial, Slack, Subversion, Redmine, and more.
Pros
Cons
Best notification review system
Overview
Codestriker is an open-source web application designed to facilitate collaborative code reviewing. It allows for comprehensive code inspection, enabling users to record comments, issues, and decisions in a centralized database.
Pricing
Codestriker is available for free.
Why I Picked Codestriker
Codestriker stands out for its notification review system, which alerts chosen reviewers to participate in code review topics. Completed reviews are structured and stored in a relational database, making them easily searchable within Codestriker. Additionally, Codestriker streamlines traditional document reviews, reducing paperwork and enhancing efficiency.
Standout Features & Integrations
Key features include documentation support, diff views, configurable metric systems, and code metrics. Codestriker integrates with various version control systems including CVS, Visual SourceSafe, Perforce, Bugzilla, and Subversion.
Pros
Cons
Best peer-based code review & collaboration tool
Overview
Collaborator is a cloud-based code review software developed by SmartBear Software. What makes Collaborator unique is that it is specifically designed for peer-review collaboration. It provides custom templates, workflow configurations, checklists, and other features that allow QA teams to build peer-review frameworks.
Why I picked Collaborator
Collaborator provides much more than soft code review. It allows teams to interact effectively while reviewing requirements, design documents, test plans, user stories, and all documentation in one place.
Collaborator allows IT and cross-functional teams to collaborate by scrutinizing changes between versions together and engaging in creative discussion while also subsequently allowing them to mark defects and categorize them effectively. Collaborator is an enterprise-grade tool used by various industries to ensure that changes to models or code repositories have been reviewed and signed off by the relevant stakeholders.
Standout Features & Integrations
Features include iultiple code review templates, Effectively track and manage defects, Build custom review templates, and Report Generation.
Integrations include Jira, GitHub, GitLab, Eclipse, Bitbucket, SimuLink, Visual Studio, and many more.
Pros
Cons
Best free, open-source document review tool
Overview
Review Board is a free, open-source, web-based document review tool designed for flexibility with different workflows in mind. It provides developer and QA teams to review, discuss, and track pull requests and issues in one place.
Why I Picked Review Board
Review Board is ideal for small startups to large-scale enterprises due to its ability to take the pain out of the code review process. It has an enhanced diff viewer that excels in syntax highlighting and indentation change indicators while tracking document changes and pending code.
Review Board Standout Features & Integrations
Pros
Cons
Best project management code review tool
Overview
Phabricator is an open-source web-based code review tool that offers a comprehensive platform for managing software development projects. It utilizes an asynchronous process similar to pull requests in GitHub, supporting both pre-push “review” and post-push “audit” workflows.
Pricing
Phabricator is available for free.
Why I Picked Phabricator
Phabricator stands out for its innovative features aimed at maintaining codebase integrity. It allows teams to track changes to specific features or elements of the codebase using Herald rules, automatically notifying relevant parties of code revisions. This feature is particularly useful for monitoring changes made by less experienced team members or external contributors. With its enhanced audit and review processes, Phabricator is well-suited for organizations that prioritize rule-based checks and balances in their code review workflows.
Standout Features & Integrations
Key features include agile code review processes, source code auditing, enhanced workflow for code review, and project and ticket management capabilities. Phabricator integrates with various tools including Sourcegraph, GitHub, Coda, HackerOne, and TimeDoctor.
Pros
Cons
Best tool for high-performing hotspot analysis
Overview
CodeScene is a software intelligence tool designed to visualize and map hotspots in a codebase. It aids in code review by identifying specific lines of unhealthy code that negatively impact software delivery flow.
Pricing
Pricing for CodeScene is available upon request.
Why I Picked CodeScene
CodeScene stands out for its ability to help organizations understand the root causes of code quality issues, enabling them to prioritize bug fixes, improvements, and new features effectively. With its hotspot analysis and technical debt management capabilities, CodeScene provides precise feedback to enhance remediation efforts, reducing the prevalence of technical debt.
Standout Features & Integrations
Key features include code health metrics, virtual code reviewer, code quality management, and knowledge metrics. CodeScene integrates with various CI/CD tools including Azure DevOps, GitHub, Bitbucket, GitLab, Gerrit, and others.
Pros
Cons
While they didn’t make the top list, here are some additional code review tools worth considering:
11. SonarQube – Best for automatic reviews with static analysis of code.
12. GitLab – Best collaborative code review platform.
. Veracode – Best for comprehensive appsec & code review tool.
DeepSource – A static code analysis tool helping resolve critical bugs and ship better code faster.
Gogs – An open-source, self-hosted git service written in Go, offering application version tracking with minimal overhead.
Codebeat – An open-source team management tool enabling code monitoring in web and mobile apps through automated static code analysis.
JArchitect – A Java code review tool providing dependency visualization and support for numerous metrics.
Reshift – A continuous integration, SaaS-based code review tool integrating into existing workflows to identify vulnerabilities.
JetBrains Upsource – An advanced static code analysis tool facilitating code review with code-aware navigation.
Peer Review for Trac – A Trac plugin incorporating code review for developers.
Visual Expert – A static analyzer for Oracle, PowerBuilder, and SQL Server detecting flaws and vulnerabilities without breaking code dependencies.
Snyk – A DevSecOps tool ensuring security, particularly with open-source code dependencies.
CodeFactor.io – A git automated code review tool enabling fixing problematic files, tracking bug issues, commits, and pull requests.
Embold – An AI-enabled code analyzer discovering vulnerabilities and anti-patterns to manage technical debt.
Helix Swarm – A free web-based tool encouraging more code reviews through a streamlined process.
Codegrip – Simplifying code review process for QA teams through rule customizations and streamlined steps.
Gitea – A code collaboration and version control positioned as an alternative to GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket.
Axolo – Facilitating faster code merging with pull requests reviewed in Slack.
Barkeep – A “friendly code review system” providing syntax-highlighted and colored diffs favored by engineering organizations.
JetBrains Space – Allows teams to perform, discuss, and keep track of code reviews easily.
Crucible – A collaborative code review tool with a structured workflow for Dev teams executing quick reviews.
CAST – It is an automated tool that excels in analyzing more than 50 languages, making it versatile for projects of any size.
Choosing the right code review tools is pivotal for maintaining code quality, fostering team collaboration, and ensuring efficient development processes. My selection process is grounded in direct experience and extensive research, focusing on functionalities that address the diverse challenges and demands of software development teams. Below, I outline my criteria for evaluating these tools, ensuring they meet the varied needs of developers, project managers, and organizations at large.
To merit inclusion in my list of the best code review tools, a solution must support common use cases fundamental to virtually every development team’s workflow. These include:
Distinguishing the best tools in the market involves identifying unique features and functionality not offered by the competition. These features elevate a code review tool from merely functional to an indispensable asset for a development team. Examples include:
The balance between powerful functionality and user-friendly design is crucial for code review tools. When evaluating usability, factors such as intuitive interfaces, clear documentation, efficient navigation, and responsive design are considered.
The transition to a new code review tool should be smooth, with comprehensive training materials, interactive product tours, accessible customer support, and import tools for migrating from other systems.
Reliable customer support is vital for resolving technical issues and ensuring minimal disruption to development workflows. Criteria include multiple support channels, prompt responses, community support, and regular updates.
The cost of a code review tool must be balanced against the features and benefits it provides, with transparent pricing models, flexible plans, free trials or demos, and competitive pricing considered.
Feedback from users offers valuable insights into a tool’s real-world performance, including user satisfaction, testimonials, case studies, and how developers respond to feedback.
By meticulously evaluating code review tools against these criteria, I aim to provide software buyers with a comprehensive guide that addresses their specific needs, streamlines their development processes, and contributes to the production of high-quality software.
Software trends have significantly influenced the evolution of code review tools, reflecting the changing landscape of software development and testing. By examining product updates, press releases, and release logs from the most rapidly evolving tools, we can identify key trends shaping the future of software testing and code review processes. These trends not only highlight the most sought-after features but also provide insights into the functionality that is becoming less demanded.
A notable trend is the deeper integration with advanced automated testing frameworks and continuous integration/continuous deployment (CI/CD) pipelines. This integration facilitates a more seamless and automated workflow, allowing developers and testers to identify and address issues earlier in the development cycle. The focus on enhancing these integrations suggests an industry-wide push towards more efficient, DevOps-oriented development practices.
Machine learning and artificial intelligence technologies are increasingly being leveraged to automate code review processes. These tools now offer advanced features such as automatic bug detection, code quality suggestions, and even predictive analytics for potential future errors. This evolution points to a demand for smarter, more autonomous tools that can enhance productivity and accuracy in code reviews.
The introduction of real-time collaboration features within code review tools is an unusual yet highly innovative trend. These functionalities allow distributed teams to review and edit code simultaneously, as if they were in the same room. This capability is especially pertinent in today’s remote-first work environment, indicating a shift towards tools that support a more collaborative and interactive review process.
As cybersecurity threats continue to evolve, there is a growing emphasis on security and compliance features within code review tools. This includes advanced vulnerability scanning, codebase compliance checks against industry standards, and more robust access controls. The prioritization of these features underscores the critical need for software development tools to ensure code integrity and protect against potential security breaches.
With the advent of automated code review technologies, features that support manual review processes are becoming less important. While manual review will always have a place in the software development lifecycle, the demand for manual review features is diminishing as automated and AI-driven tools become more capable and reliable.
The software testing and code review landscape are characterized by a shift towards automation, real-time collaboration, and enhanced security, reflecting broader trends in software development towards efficiency, collaboration, and cybersecurity. As these tools continue to evolve, developers and QA testers can expect a future where code review processes are more integrated, intelligent, and secure, ultimately leading to higher quality software and more streamlined development workflows. These trends not only address the current needs and challenges faced by software professionals but also anticipate the future demands of an increasingly complex and dynamic software development ecosystem.
Code review tools are software that aid development teams in examining and improving the source code. They provide a platform for developers to collaboratively review, discuss, and annotate code, integrating with version control systems to streamline the process. These tools are essential for maintaining high standards of code quality and ensuring consistency across a software project.
The benefits and uses of code review tools include improving the overall quality of code by identifying bugs, syntax errors, and enforcing coding standards. They facilitate collaboration and knowledge sharing among team members, enhancing the skill set of the entire team. By enabling early detection of potential issues, these tools help in reducing the long-term costs associated with fixing bugs. They also serve as a record of decisions and changes made, aiding in future code understanding and maintenance.
Selecting the right code review tool is crucial for efficiently executing software tests. These tools play a critical role in ensuring code quality, identifying bugs early, and streamlining the development process. Here, I highlight the most important features to look for in code review tools that are crucial for successfully executing software tests.
Choosing a code review tool with these features is essential for teams aiming to enhance their software testing processes. By ensuring thorough code reviews, early detection of issues, and seamless integration with testing workflows, these tools support the delivery of high-quality software. As we embrace these capabilities, we pave the way for more efficient, effective, and secure software development lifecycles.
Code review tools serve as indispensable assets for software development teams, offering a suite of benefits that enhance both efficiency and quality in software projects. For potential buyers exploring software testing tools, understanding the primary advantages these tools provide can guide decision-making and investment. Here are five primary benefits that code review tools offer to users and organizations:
For organizations striving to optimize their software development lifecycle, investing in code review tools presents a strategic advantage. These tools not only enhance the technical quality of software projects but also contribute to a more collaborative, efficient, and secure development process. The cumulative effect of these benefits can lead to significant improvements in product quality, team performance, and overall business outcomes, making code review tools a vital component of modern software development practices.
When exploring code review tools, understanding the range of plan and pricing options available is crucial for making an informed decision that aligns with your organizational needs and budget. Code review tools come with various pricing models to cater to different sizes of teams, project scales, and feature requirements. These tools often offer plans from basic, free versions to more sophisticated, enterprise-level solutions. Here’s a breakdown of the common plan options and what they typically include, aimed at assisting software buyers in navigating their choices.
Choosing the right plan depends on your team’s size, the complexity of your projects, and specific needs like security and compliance. It’s important to weigh the balance between cost and the value of advanced features, ensuring the chosen plan not only fits your current requirements but also has the scope to accommodate future growth.
In conclusion, code reviews are a fundamental aspect of the software development process, blending technical expertise with creative problem-solving. By thoroughly examining code changes, teams can identify errors, improve code quality, and foster collaboration among team members.
The diverse array of code review tools available today offers teams the opportunity to streamline their review processes, automate repetitive tasks, and ultimately deliver higher quality software products. Whether it’s through automated analysis, peer collaboration platforms, or integrated development environments, there’s a tool to suit every team’s needs and preferences.
I hope this article has ignited your curiosity to explore the intricacies of code review tools further. By embracing these tools and adopting best practices in code review, teams can elevate their development process, produce more robust code, and ultimately achieve greater success in their software projects.
Pre-commit code review involves examining code changes before they are committed to the version control system. This proactive approach helps identify and address potential issues or bugs early on, preventing them from becoming part of the codebase.
On the other hand, post-commit code review entails reviewing code changes after they have already been committed to the version control system. While not as preemptive as pre-commit review, it serves as a secondary check to detect any issues that may have been overlooked during pre-commit review or to review changes made by other team members.
Incorporating code review tools into your software development process offers numerous benefits that can significantly enhance the quality, efficiency, and security of your projects. Here are compelling reasons why you should use these tools:
Comply with Standards: For projects requiring adherence to specific coding standards and regulations, code review tools can automate compliance checks, ensuring consistent adherence to required criteria.
Code review tools come in various types, each serving different purposes and catering to specific needs within the software development process. Here are the main types of code review tools:
Code Metrics and Quality Tools: Code quality tools focus on monitoring and improving overall code quality metrics such as complexity, duplication, and test coverage. They help teams identify areas for improvement, optimize codebase health, and maintain code quality standards over time.
4.7/5
4.8/5
4.4/5
4.6/5
Pakistan
Punjab, Pakistan
28-E PIA, ECHS, Block E Pia Housing Scheme, Lahore, 54770
Phone : (+92) 300 2189222 (PK)
Australia
Perth, Western Australia
25 Mount Prospect Crescent, Maylands, Perth, 6051
Dubai
Albarsha , Dubai
Suhul Building No. 606, Albarsha 1, 47512
Phone : (+92) 300 2189222 (PK)